high fivers

Analysis and further commentary on the transcripts: http://www.takeourworldback.com/dancingisraelisfbireport.htm#analysis

Here are a few questions:

• Why would anyone need or find it desirable to travel to another observation point that provided "a view of the entire length of both towers" prior to the second impact, given that the Urban Moving Systems roof provided a suitable vantage point for observing and "documenting" a plane crash into the north face of the North Tower at around the 95th floor, plane crashes did not have a history of bringing down 110-story buildings, and innocent bystanders were unaware that a second plane was scheduled to approach from the south and crash into floors 78 to 84 of the south face of the other tower minutes later? After all, some of New York's tall buildings are visible even at street level at W. 18th Street, Weehawken (click here for Google Street View), and more are visible at street level just down the road at Willow Avenue where Urban Moving rented storage space.

• Why would anyone who was already located at a suitable vantage point for "documenting" a plane crash choose instead to persuade their colleagues to take time off work, collect their cameras, back packs and notebooks, rush out to their company van, drive through rush-hour traffic to another observation point that is normally a four or five-minute drive from the office, drive into the apartment complex, around to the rear parking lot, park at an angle to the fence so that the front of the van faces in a south-southeast direction towards the WTC, get out of the van with their cameras, climb onto the roof (all of this wasting valuable "documenting" time), in order to obtain a "view of the entire length of both towers"? Why was it so important to get an unobstructed view of the South Tower, before it was hit by a plane?

• Why would movers, supposedly on a "working holiday", take such an interest in "documenting" a straightforward plane crash that they would choose to leave their workplace, given that the mainstream media would be quite capable of recording the event, and given that the movers' boss Dominik Suter had a reputation for being tight with money and thus would have been unlikely to let them have time off work for their new hobby? Omer Marmari, although not one of those seen at Doric Towers, even claimed he'd been so concerned that he might have been late for work that day that he barely had time to glance at television monitors showing the smoking WTC.

• How would amateur journalists know, prior to the second plane impact, that what was originally a simple plane crash would go on to become a "new Pearl Harbor" and pivotal event at the turn of the century, such that it would be worth taking time off work to go away and "take a picture of the event for history"?

• If three people are informed by telephone of a news event, two of them have at most to grab binoculars and look out the window, and the third must get on the internet and browse U.S. and Israeli news sites, persuade several colleagues that the event is worthy of taking time off work to go away and "document" it for historical purposes, collect cameras, back packs and notebooks, rush out to a van, drive through rush-hour traffic to an observation point chosen on the spur of the moment that is normally a four or five-minute drive from the office, drive into the apartment complex, around to the rear parking lot, park at an angle to the fence so that the front of the van faces in a south-southeast direction towards the WTC, get out of the van with the cameras, and climb onto the roof, which of them would likely take longest to complete the task?

• How could the Israeli news site YNET.co.il and the U.S. site CNN.com have news posted about the first plane crash so that several Israelis could browse the internet and read about it on Urban's computers for a "few minutes," then three of the Israelis decide it would be a good move to grab their cameras, jump into their employer's van and take time off work in order to "document" the event, go on a four or five-minute journey through rush-hour traffic, make a left turn and drive along to a parking lot at the back of an apartment complex, jump out and climb onto the top of the van and turn on their cameras, all before the local AM WINS news radio station was able to broadcast its breaking news report from a WINS account executive who was on scene and actually telephoned the WINS newsroom as the first plane crashed?

• Why would movers who had judged a single plane crash to be such an important historical event that it was worth "documenting" by taking time off work, driving through rush-hour traffic to a vantage point that provided "a view of the entire length of both towers", climbing atop the van, etc, decide within a few minutes - and probably after a second plane impact, that it was not worth staying for and they should return to the workplace (in one of Ellner's version of events) or move on to Liberty State Park? How did they know there wouldn't be a third plane crash within the next few minutes, which they would miss if choosing to move on?

• Why should movers cum amateur journalists perceive a plane crash to be an event worth celebrating, smiling, giving each other high fives, hugging each other, joking in cries of joy and mockery, posing to be photographed with the burning building in the background whilst flicking a lighter like they were at a rock concert, etc?

• Why did Oded Ellner, after appearing happy in the photographs, go on to attempt to explain it with remarks about how Israel had been "dealing with incidents like this for years" and how he believed the United States would "take steps to stop terrorism in the world," when all publicly available evidence at the time of the three Israelis appearing happy pointed to a single accidental plane crash?

• Why would movers who were not complicit in terrorism, who were merely "documenting" a plane crash whilst on a "working holiday" in a foreign land, and who could at most be in trouble for illegal working and immigration violations, need to lie about their movements between the hours of 08:00 a.m. and 09:00 a.m. on September 11, 2001?

• Why would Yaron Shmuel need to lie with a claim that they were on the "West Side Highway" at the time of the "incident"?

• Why would Oded Ellner need to lie with a story about stopping at a Gulf gas station after learning of the first impact whilst at Urban Moving Systems' office at 3 West 18th Street, Weehawken, but before being seen on top of a van parked at the Doric apartment block rear parking lot, 100 Manhattan Avenue, Union City, before the local WINS 1010 news radio station had even broken the news of the first plane crash?

• Why would Sivan Kurzberg, whose job in Israel had involved hunting Arabs for the Zionist regime, need to lie with a story about looking on the internet and climbing up on the Urban Moving Systems roof after learning of the first plane impact and then getting "caught in heavy traffic," prior to being seen on top of a van parked at Doric before the local WINS 1010 news radio station had even broken the news of the first plane crash?

• Is it just a "coincidence" that Urban Moving Systems was closed down and the employees told they'd been fired at lunch time on 9/11/01, as consistent with an intelligence front that had just become redundant following completion of the mission, given that lunch time on 9/11/01 was before Oded Ellner, Yaron Shmuel, Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, and Omer Marmari were arrested that afternoon, and before Dominik Suter should have been aware that he needed to flee the country because his "amateur journalist" employees got into trouble?