110 stories

110 stories
110 stories

Sunday, April 3, 2022

document the event?


They needed a video of the first plane because what if Naudet didn’t capture the first plane AA11, then they would’ve made the 9/11 documentary around the Urban Moving Systems video, the one the FBI couldn’t locate when they arrested the five israelis in New Jersey on 9/11 after eyewitnesses saw them in the parking lot behind the Doric apartments (as well as in Liberty State Park in NJ) with what they explicitly described as a handheld video camera featuring a pop-out LCD screen, the same one I believe they used for panning the skyline and recording AA11 as it streamed down the Hudson and plowed into the Notth Tower at a crazy fast speed, thus beginning the new Pearl Harbor, but one that was far more deadly and costly in terms of endless wars and death and destruction and psychological warfare on levels unprecedented and most likely to never be repeated, at least in my lifetime, although I do have an argument about how covid is the new Pearl Harbor, the new 9/11, the biological 9/11, the psychological 9/11, the deadliest 9/11 thus far, but I’ll save that for another day.

“Document the event.” That is what one of the UMS israelis said when interviewed on israeli television. What did he mean? Was he being literal? Was his purpose to “document the event”? I believe he was proud of his documentation, but angry that he couldn’t show it to the world because of the Naudet tape. I believe there were multiple groups of israelis, throughout the United States, especially in Florida, New York, New Jersey, and some other key locations. I believe some of them were fronting as moving companies, even the FBI said it was unusual that inside the van containing the israelis arrested on 9/11, there were no indicators that it was used as a moving truck. No blankets, gloves, boxes, packaging materials, ropes, etc. you wouldn’t have known they were a moving company by looking inside their truck. More than a dozen computers were found networked inside their office. What size moving company do you think would need more than a dozen computers to running their business? Even the FBI commented that it was an unusually large number of computers for a business its size. Why did Suter, the owner of UMS, suddenly fly back to israel once fights resumed? Why did he leave his business behind? The same business for which he received a 600K government business loan during summer, 2001. Why did the israeils have plane tickets for Tel Aviv via Greece dated 9/12? Why were they ready to leave the US the day after 9/11? Why did they lie about their whereabouts when the first plane hit the north tower at 846a? Why did they fail multiple polygraphs? Why were they deported back to israel 71 days after they were detained? Chertoff? Mueller? Barr? Anyone?

Recently, a new 9/11 video has surfaced. In my opinion, it is the best video of UA175 approaching the South Tower. It is excellent quality. There are other videos which are equally phenomenal, but this new video is fresh, and the angle is unique. The video camera was in the right place at the right time. Here’s the alleged story: 




Kevin Westley shot his video on 9/11 from a ferry off the southern end of Manhattan where the Hudson and East Rivers converge in Upper New York Bay, south of the Battery, on the top deck of a ferry (Staten Island ferry?) with dozens of other onlookers, and Kevin has the video camera, thankfully he didn’t leave it home or in the hotel room. What was he doing there on 9/11? Was he on vacation? With family? Work trip? Did he live in Brooklyn or New Jersey? What took him 20 years to publicize the video? Read what he says in the description of the video on youtube. He claims he “posted the video in the 2000s but accidentally made it private, and I just realized it was private so I made it public.” He didn’t say whether he posted it privately on youtube or on another site. If he posted it on youtube, the earliest he could have posted it was 2005. This begs the question, Did youtube have a private feature in 2005? I know, I’m splitting hairs here, but I suffer from curiosity syndrome and I would like to know if he posted it privately on youtube, and which year did youtube first allow private videos to be posted? They are honest questions, we’re still allowed to ask questions, right?

I started to go down the Kevin Westley rabbit hole, but I decided to resurface before I crossed the point of no return. I saw he worked for Boeing, served in Iraq after 9/11, etc., but I want to focus on the video. The video is what matters. Maybe Weatley was told to have his video camera ready on the morning of 9/11, in perfect view of the South Tower and the approach of UA175, you know, right place at the right time, like the Naudet brothers, filmmakers who were making a documentary about a rookie firefighter, and Naudet happened to be filming the fire department’s response to a gas leak with a perfect vantage point of the North Tower, and the approach of AA11. Right place at the right time. And now, more than 20 years after 9/11, we finally have a video to compliment the Naudet video. A sister video. In my opinion, they are the best (not the best word lol) videos to emerge from 9/11. Here is the Naudet video.

But, these are two videos that were seemingly produced for mass consumption, to produce a desired effect, trauma. The Naudet video was featured in their documentary 9/11, released on 9/11/02. Of course, these videos are overshadowed by the video we haven’t seen. The video we know exists because eyewitnesses were certain they observed a handheld camera with LCD pop-out screen used for making videos. Surprise, the israelis denied they were taking video on the morning of 9/11, and the FBI claimed they didn’t discover any videos, only 35mm rolls of film which they developed, the rolls of film which featured one of the israelis holding up a cigarette lighter to one of the burning towers as though he was setting it on fire. Yes, without the israeli video from the man who said he was there to document the event, without that video we have an incomplete collection. The israeli video likely captures AA11 as it is flying down the Hudson, 10-20 seconds before it strikes the North Tower, with a perfect vantage point from the parking lot of the Doric Apartments. Obviously, the perfect vantage point would have been somewhere on the island of Manhattan, but then they may have been trapped on the island once the bridges and tunnels were closed down, so they trusted Naudet would get the right shot, and he certainly did, but I want to see the israeli video. By all likelihood they reached the Doric by 8:32am, nearly 15 minutes before AA11 hit the North Tower, in other words, plenty of time for the israelis to position themselves on top of their truck, in preparation for the event. To document the event.


Saturday, April 2, 2022

the globalists

I’ll start by saying this: There is more than meets the eye regarding the Sandy Hook Elementary School event. I haven’t been down the SHES rabbit hole in several years, but when I walked away from it in 2013-14, I was a firm believer that the event was staged and that no children were murdered by the alleged perpetrator Adam Lanza. At that time I believed that 27 students and staff weren’t killed on December 14, 2012. But I had to eventually walk away because I was deep down the rabbit hole and I had not seen light for weeks, if not months. It was dark and depressing. It was psychological warfare to the utmost degree. It was sickening. So, I walked away and didn’t look back for a long time. Then the Boston bombing PSYOP happened.

Sometime in 2017, I was reading Michael Collins Piper’s book False Flags: Templates for Terror, where he had written a chapter about Sandy Hook. And in the chapter he expressed his position that Snady Hook was a real event where children were killed, and it was part of an anti-gun agenda maybe, and goes on to say that people pushing the Sandy Hook hoax narrative are purposefully muddying the waters in “conspiracy theory” circles.

*cues Cass Sunstein*

So, I began to think about Alex Jones, the InfoWars entertainer/exaggerator, and his claim that no one died at Sandy Hook, and how his claims landed him in legal trouble, the lawsuits contending that “he showed a reckless disregard for the truth which caused distress to the parents of the Sandy Hook victims.” Not to mention the fact that Jones was making the claims, while profiting in the process, money from the sales of the merch and elixirs on his website as well as the advertisers on his syndicated radio program. It’s possibly part of a deal he brokered with his handlers. It’s possible Jones is an asset and he intentionally muddied the waters with very limited rules (golden rule: hands off israel) and he obscenely profited from his website and radio broadcast, and it’s possible that when he was no longer useful as an asset (specifically after his alleged role in orchestrating the Capitol Riot PSYOP) and power shifted to the other divide and conquer war party, he was no longer useful and thus thrown to the legal wolves, to set an example, and to further discredit “conspiracy theorists,” not just regarding Sandy Hook, but also 9/11, especially 9/11, even if by default, but not default alone.

Alex Jones is the tin foil hat poster child. Sorry, it’s true. He was never anything more than an entertainer. Whether it is by intel design or his own design, he serves the same purpose no matter which circumstances landed him in his situation or position (let’s not forget about his ex-wife, Kelly Nichols). It was evident even during Y2K, remember during that particular radio broadcast he was proclaiming, “The Russians are coming!” and shit about the power grid and ATM machines and martial law. He was full of shit, possibly a controlled opposition asset by the turn of the century, or even around the time of 9/11. Let’s not forget that he sometimes boasted about his familial intelligence connections. In some ways Jones was “successful” but now he’s trying to squeeze his way out of a trial, offering each of the victims families $120K to settle outside of the courtroom, but they refused his offer. Do the families have a number? What if he offers them each $1 million? Would that be enough? Do they have a crazy price?

In court documents, Jones says he suffered mental illness (or something similar) and that is why he believed and proclaimed that no children died at Sandy Hook, it’s all fake, even the families are fake. And, now here we are, 25 years after Alex Jones claimed in a 1997 police report that a group of counterculture gen-x types assaulted him at the radio station and were going to kill him, at least he was punched in the face multiple times by the gen-x types, as well as by his producer Charlie Sotelo, because he just didn’t know when to shut the fuck up.

I haven’t concluded whether or not Jones is/was an asset. I believe if he is an asset, still being used, in this case, it is to backtrack and apologize about his proclamations regarding Sandy Hook even though the families allegedly don’t give a fuck, that’s not his purpose and effect (remember muddying the waters and discrediting “conspiracy theorists”). If Jones was groomed as an asset as early as high school, don't forget his family moved from Dallas to Austin after Jones got in trouble for fighting. Personally, it doesn’t matter to me whether Jones was or wasn’t an intel asset, either way he’s still muddying the waters, backtracking on Sandy Hook, blaming mental illness, making up shit, exaggerating the facts. etc. Either way, the effect is the same, he is now a meme for “crazed conspiracy theorist” and he ultimately connects conspiracy theorists to the right-wing, republican, libertarian, conservative, whatever the fuck you want to call it, but that’s the Alex Jones effect, and it’s just one of his effects. It’s a typical divide and conquer paradigm, remember, the powerful want the proletariat fighting amongst each other rather than joining together and destroying the powerful by whatever means necessary.

Think about it. The modern poster child for tin foil hat (their phrase, not mine lol)  is Alex Jones, I mean he has been one of the most mainstream conspiracy theorists since 9/11, and remember it was Nichols who really made Jones into an icon, she managed the website, she got his wheels rolling up to full speed, she essentially created his persona and he owes her the world, but right now he’s trying to buy his way out of litigation. Either way, he’s going to be the example. It doesn’t matter if he is or isn’t an asset, the outcome is still the same: Jones is now the poster child for any “crazed conspiracy theorist” who believes 9/11 was an inside job. He’s being likened to Trump, QAnon, and the fake moon landing (all the way back to the late 1990s he was proclaiming NASA faked the moon landing). And now, if you question any official narrative, you are an “Alex Jones type” and/or a “tin foil hatter.” That is the outcome. One of the effects. That is the Alex Jones effect. According to the court documents, he knows that children died at Sandy Hook, and he blamed his mental state on “the trauma of the media and corporations lying so much.” He also claimed that a “form of psychosis” made him believe that Sandy Hook was a staged event. That’s the PSYOP. A form of psychosis. From here forward, if you question events such as Sandy Hook, 9/11, and of course covid, then you are suffering from psychosis.

*Cass Sunstein wins*

Like I said, I’m not sure if Alex Jones is a controlled op. I can go either way on the issue because it doesn’t change the effect of Alex Jones. It doesn’t matter if it’s his ex-wife, intel handlers, Jesuits, gay frogs, or even Alex Jones himself, his Fed status really doesn’t matter. What matters are the effects of Alex Jones, and that is a win for “the globalists” (one of AJ’s most repeated phrases) listen, and you can hear him saying it:

          the globalists the globalists

          the globalists the globalists the globalists

          the globalists

          gay frogs gay frogs gay frogs

          the globalists the globalists

          the globalists the globalists the globalists

          the globalists

They win because Jones is absolutely nothing more than a meme on steroids. Just remember, from here forward, if you question the official stories of major events like 9/11 or Sandy Hook or even covid, then you are an Alex Jones crazed right-wing republican tin foil hatter living in mom’s basement conspiracy theorist. Whatever that means.

*Sunstein introduces Joe Rogan*

Wait, didn’t Jones say shit about Rogan awhile back or was that just made-up internet bullshit? Shit for clicks. Fuck them both.




Photo by Shannon Hicks of the Newtown Bee