“Document the event.” That is what one of the UMS israelis said when interviewed on israeli television. What did he mean? Was he being literal? Was his purpose to “document the event”? I believe he was proud of his documentation, but angry that he couldn’t show it to the world because of the Naudet tape. I believe there were multiple groups of israelis, throughout the United States, especially in Florida, New York, New Jersey, and some other key locations. I believe some of them were fronting as moving companies, even the FBI said it was unusual that inside the van containing the israelis arrested on 9/11, there were no indicators that it was used as a moving truck. No blankets, gloves, boxes, packaging materials, ropes, etc. you wouldn’t have known they were a moving company by looking inside their truck. More than a dozen computers were found networked inside their office. What size moving company do you think would need more than a dozen computers to running their business? Even the FBI commented that it was an unusually large number of computers for a business its size. Why did Suter, the owner of UMS, suddenly fly back to israel once fights resumed? Why did he leave his business behind? The same business for which he received a 600K government business loan during summer, 2001. Why did the israeils have plane tickets for Tel Aviv via Greece dated 9/12? Why were they ready to leave the US the day after 9/11? Why did they lie about their whereabouts when the first plane hit the north tower at 846a? Why did they fail multiple polygraphs? Why were they deported back to israel 71 days after they were detained? Chertoff? Mueller? Barr? Anyone?
Recently, a new 9/11 video has surfaced. In my opinion, it is the best video of UA175 approaching the South Tower. It is excellent quality. There are other videos which are equally phenomenal, but this new video is fresh, and the angle is unique. The video camera was in the right place at the right time. Here’s the alleged story:
Kevin Westley shot his video on 9/11 from a ferry off the southern end of Manhattan where the Hudson and East Rivers converge in Upper New York Bay, south of the Battery, on the top deck of a ferry (Staten Island ferry?) with dozens of other onlookers, and Kevin has the video camera, thankfully he didn’t leave it home or in the hotel room. What was he doing there on 9/11? Was he on vacation? With family? Work trip? Did he live in Brooklyn or New Jersey? What took him 20 years to publicize the video? Read what he says in the description of the video on youtube. He claims he “posted the video in the 2000s but accidentally made it private, and I just realized it was private so I made it public.” He didn’t say whether he posted it privately on youtube or on another site. If he posted it on youtube, the earliest he could have posted it was 2005. This begs the question, Did youtube have a private feature in 2005? I know, I’m splitting hairs here, but I suffer from curiosity syndrome and I would like to know if he posted it privately on youtube, and which year did youtube first allow private videos to be posted? They are honest questions, we’re still allowed to ask questions, right?
I started to go down the Kevin Westley rabbit hole, but I decided to resurface before I crossed the point of no return. I saw he worked for Boeing, served in Iraq after 9/11, etc., but I want to focus on the video. The video is what matters. Maybe Weatley was told to have his video camera ready on the morning of 9/11, in perfect view of the South Tower and the approach of UA175, you know, right place at the right time, like the Naudet brothers, filmmakers who were making a documentary about a rookie firefighter, and Naudet happened to be filming the fire department’s response to a gas leak with a perfect vantage point of the North Tower, and the approach of AA11. Right place at the right time. And now, more than 20 years after 9/11, we finally have a video to compliment the Naudet video. A sister video. In my opinion, they are the best (not the best word lol) videos to emerge from 9/11. Here is the Naudet video.
But, these are two videos that were seemingly produced for mass consumption, to produce a desired effect, trauma. The Naudet video was featured in their documentary 9/11, released on 9/11/02. Of course, these videos are overshadowed by the video we haven’t seen. The video we know exists because eyewitnesses were certain they observed a handheld camera with LCD pop-out screen used for making videos. Surprise, the israelis denied they were taking video on the morning of 9/11, and the FBI claimed they didn’t discover any videos, only 35mm rolls of film which they developed, the rolls of film which featured one of the israelis holding up a cigarette lighter to one of the burning towers as though he was setting it on fire. Yes, without the israeli video from the man who said he was there to document the event, without that video we have an incomplete collection. The israeli video likely captures AA11 as it is flying down the Hudson, 10-20 seconds before it strikes the North Tower, with a perfect vantage point from the parking lot of the Doric Apartments. Obviously, the perfect vantage point would have been somewhere on the island of Manhattan, but then they may have been trapped on the island once the bridges and tunnels were closed down, so they trusted Naudet would get the right shot, and he certainly did, but I want to see the israeli video. By all likelihood they reached the Doric by 8:32am, nearly 15 minutes before AA11 hit the North Tower, in other words, plenty of time for the israelis to position themselves on top of their truck, in preparation for the event. To document the event.