which came first?

Note: I began writing this post in June 2022, approximately one week after the Robb Elementary School shooting in Uvalde, Texas which took place on May 24, 2022. Like many of my posts, this one is incomplete.

The gun debate only lasted a few days this time. More attention was directed at the Uvalde police because they waited over an hour before they entered the school. All cops are bastards, all of them. The Uvalde cops were waiting for the border patrol, or so it goes, I don’t even know, to be honest, the hyper focus on every mass shooting, the media infatuation, the social media clickbait, the endless theories and opinions, and then the gun control debate, yes, the same tired debate after every major shooting, it’s just another divide and conquer psyop, in a never ending barrage of psyops, they’re not going to take your guns, and if they try to take them by force, then shoot to kill, I mean, that’s what all the guns are for, right, to protect the family and the home from intruders, and to the other people who want to take the guns, why do you want the Feds to take possession of all the firearms? Why do you trust the police and military with these weapons? Why are your pro-war? You should be waving a thin blue line flag for fuck’s sake. And then there’s the people in the middle of the debate who want more laws. More background checks. More restrictions. Change the age to 21. Require safety and training courses, as well as a psychological examination. Require gun owners to pay for insurance, in case anything were to happen. Yes, all great ideas, but will they become laws in every county in every state? Will they prevent just one mass shooting? Maybe, maybe not. Will potential shooters find ways around these laws? Probably. Will we see future shooters 3D printing their guns and making their own ammo? Maybe. Will we see potential shooters stealing guns to commit their crimes? Maybe. But it’s worth a try, if lawmakers really want to make these changes, they can, and I will believe it when I see it, then let’s see if the mass shootings dissipate, let’s see the results of the new laws. But none of this takes place in a vacuum, and in the meantime, continue enforcing the laws currently on the books, and remember, there are hundreds of millions, 393 million for the record, civilian-owned firearms  in the United States, and approximately 6 million of them are registered. Think about that. There are approximately (most likely many many more) 387 civilian-owned firearms in the US, enough for every person to own one firearm, and still have a surplus of 50 million firearms. Think about that. Among “developed first world” countries, the US has more firearms per capita than most other similar countries, not to mention, more mass shootings, and I do believe there is causation, rather than correlation, but there’s a distinct difference: In the US, there are 387 million unregistered firearms, so even if you upped the age to 21, required safety and training courses and/or tests, implemented a 30-day waiting period, conducted psychological screenings, required a license and insurance, or just simply confiscated all of the six million registered guns, what is going to prevent one of the other 387 million guns from ending up in the hands of a potential mass shooter? Laws don’t prevent criminal actions, they simply make the actions punishable at the hands of a judge or jury of one’s peers after the crime has been committed and the perpetrator apprehended. Remember that.

But, that’s not even why I started writing this post. Not even remotely close, but the ridiculous gun psyop gets me every time, I always get sucked into that silly rabbit hole, I mean, I no longer fall down that hole, now I just get sucked in, swallowed up, consumed. Divided and conquered. What if I purchase a vehicle, perhaps a large pickup truck with a dual axle, with the intention of using it to drive down a busy city sidewalk crowded with people, in order to cause death and carnage? Obviously the truck was not designed to kill like a gun, but it can kill just as many as the deadliest mass shooting, and it could cause major carnage, if I use the truck as a machine capable of causing the deaths of 20-30 people plus twice as many injuries? Well, there’s laws for that. You have to register and insure the vehicle. If you don’t have cash you will need a loan or credit card. You will need to purchase the title and get the car inspected. You will also need a driver’s license, which means that you will have to take a driver’s education course and pass a test and then you’re all set. Or, you could simply steal or “borrow” your mom’s car or your brother’s truck or your aunt’s SUV or some stranger’s RAM, and drive without a license, because who’s going to stop you? And what if the owner doesn’t have insurance or a title? Should we consider adding psychological exams to the requirements for a driver’s license? Or, should psychological exams be required for the purchase of a car? Any car, old or new. How do we check if a driver is registered and insured? How do we check if a gun owner is registered and insured? In an open carry setting, will there be checks? Just like the traffic checkpoints set up by local and state police, to look for drunk drivers or any other traffic violators. How do you know if So-and-So has a gun license? What if he’s open carrying an AR15? Are you going to ask him to show proof of license and registration? What about insurance? Are you going to demand to see his papers? And if not you, then will it be the state? What about the Feds? Should they have gun checkpoints in public areas where open carry is legal? It would be a great way to generate money through fines, as well as to confiscate unregistered guns, right? It would be a clear example of a police-state, right? What about vaccine checkpoints? Should there be vaccine checkpoints in public areas, or while crossing state lines in your vehicle? How about vaccine checkpoints at public office buildings and schools. At public libraries and parks. What about abortion checkpoints? Should we have those too for women thinking about crossing state lines to get an abortion?

But that’s not why I’m here, I really don’t give a fuck about the guns. If you think that more laws and psychological tests and waiting periods and age restrictions and licenses and insurance are going to prevent mass shootings, then you should push your lawmakers to write new laws. I don’t care if you own one thousand guns or like me, zero guns, I will believe it when I see it. Push your lawmakers, and we will examine the results. More children ages 5-17 have experienced myocarditis and other side effects from the covid vaccines. The evidence is easy to find. Vaccine side effects are rare, according to the trial data and subsequent studies. One example is myocarditis. The CDC has confirmed over 600 cases of myocarditis in children ages 5-17 after vaccination. Yes, it’s rare, but not as rare as being a victim in a mass shooting. And, when I say mass shooting, I’m not talking about a gang fight or drive-by or familial murder-suicide. When I say mass shooting I’m talking about Columbine, Orlando, Buffalo, Aurora, Vegas, VTech, Navy Yard, I’m talking about the real mass shootings like Texas Clocktower…

But, for some reason I have to keep coming back to the covid vaccines. I have to. All of this talk about body autonomy and abortion rights and so on, so I have to come back to the vaccines. Everyone should have control over their own body. Period. It is your body. It is my body. It is the only thing I truly own, because I can terminate it at any moment. Yes, you can also terminate my body, and I can terminate yours, too. But, no one can prevent me from taking my own life, therefore, I own it. It is my vessel. I am its captain. It is my body. It is your body. I have always been pro-abortion. Ever since high school in the early 1990s. It’s a woman’s body, it is her right to choose what to do with the cells inside her body. I will always support a woman’s right to choose. I am pro-choice, not that it matters, because it really doesn’t matter since I am a man, and I will never have to make the decision to have an abortion, but I wholeheartedly support a woman’s right to choose what she wants to do with her own body. The state doesn’t own her body. She owns her body. She is aborting the cells because she knows that she will not be able to provide for the child, no matter her reasons, they are private, her reasons are nobody’s business but her own business, and she knows her child would be neglected or abused and she would resent keeping her child, and her child would hate herself and hate her mother, and maybe her father too, if he is in her life.

Yes, I have a point. Each year in the US, there are between 600-800K abortions performed, and that number has been steadily dropping since the 1990s, but more importantly, the number of abortions per 1,000 births is 19.5. Think about that for a moment, and for ages 15-19, the number of abortions per 1,000 births is 5.8. Think about that too. Highest number of adolescent abortions occur 7-9 weeks into gestation. The age group with the highest number or reported legal abortions is 20-24 years. Think about all of these statistics. Think about women ages 15-19. For every 6 abortions, there are 994 births. Think about that for a second. I’m not asking you to think the way I do, I’m merely asking you to think.

And now let’s go back to the guns. The guns. Guns were created with one purpose: to kill living beings. We all agree on that. Guns can be used to kill animals and humans. Killing animals for food, most people agree, is okay, no problem, self-sustaining lifestyle, no harm being done. Animals aren’t tortured. Skin and fur is used for clothing and other things, all good. Now, guns can also kill humans. They can be used to commit premeditated murder, first degree murder. They can also be used to defend against an attacker or intruder, in most cases, justifiably within reason, of course, in accordance with local, state, and federal laws. If someone lunges at you with a knife, in nearly all circumstances, if you are a legal gun owner, possessing a registered gun, you can defend yourself against someone wielding a knife, of course there are exceptions to castle doctrine and stand your ground laws, but the basic idea is that anything which can be viewed as an imminent threat, such as a knife, bat or pipe, and of course, a gun, can be met with equal deadly force, so if I come at you with a knife and you cannot flee or escape the situation, then you are legally justified to put a couple of bullets in my chest to stop me from using deadly force against you. This begs the question: were guns designed as offensive or defensive weapons, and which one is more important? Which one defines guns without question, without debate? I can kill you with my gun, but you can defend yourself against me and my gun with your own gun. Which came first, the chicken or the egg?

Seriously though, which is it? If guns were originally designed to be used to hunt animals, then the idea of using them as a defensive weapon perhaps wasn’t considered because the originators of guns, and any weapon that shoots a projectile for that matter, were most likely all created for offensive purposes, not defensive purposes. But, if you go back to a time before guns, back to arrows, darts, stones, etc, then you realize that most weapons were designed to kill other animals for food, clothing, and weapons (yes, bones can be transformed into sharp or blunt objects that can be used to kill animals or humans. But, the idea of creating weapons for hunting purposes does not negate the fact that weapons are also used for defensive purposes. Even catapults were used to breach walls and cause catastrophic damage to infrastructure, as well as produce casualties from falling debris or being in direct path of the catapult’s projectile(s). Look at the crossbow, it too was designed with the intention of killing animals, it is extremely effective, and almost guaranteed to kill if you hit the right spot(s). Once again, offensive weapons. Now, I’m going to make a leap here, and I’m making this leap so you can see for yourself if there are any similarities between the two examples. Cars. People like to talk about cars in relation to guns and gun control and gun laws, etc. Cars were designed to take its occupants from point A to point B in a fraction of the time of a horse and buggy. They were designed for travel. But, somewhere along the way, someone decided to use a car or a truck or any vehicle, whichever was the first mass vehicle event where a driver used a vehicle to run over pedestrians with the intention of killing them. Somewhere along the way, someone, probably a man, decided to do that, to use a vehicle as a weapon of mass destruction, including truck bombs, and I would say McVeigh’s truck bomb (no, I don’t feel that he acted alone, or if he even knew the full extent of what he was going to do before he allegedly did it, seemingly on his own, but with a little help from his friend Terry Nichols, according to the official story) is an excellent example of using a vehicle for an offensive purpose, because remember, vehicles were not designed for offensive or defensive purposes, rather, they were designed for practicality, convenience, efficiency, expediency, etc., but somewhere along the way, someone decided to use a vehicle for an offensive purpose (not including war, because for war purposes, vehicles were designed with both offensive and defensive measures at the forefront, whereas the early automobiles and trucks for civilian use were death traps, and including very few, if any, safety features (defensive features due to the fact that vehicles can be extremely deadly, both due to human and mechanical error) but I digress, since I forgot what it was I was trying to articulate. 😂

To be honest, I really don’t care which came first, the chicken or the egg, because they both exist, and why does it matter how they came into existence? Similarly, I don’t care if weapons were first used for defensive or offensive purposes, because currently they are used for both, and why does it matter what they were originally designed for? For every argument claiming guns are only offensive weapons, there is a counterargument claiming guns are also defensive weapons. For what it’s worth, 99.99% of gun owners will never use their weapons offensively except to kill animals (mostly for food, but also for trophy hunting, which I despise) yet all of the attention by government, media, NGOs, advocacy groups, human rights orgs, etc, is focused on the 0.01% who use their weapons to kill other people, rarely in mass shootings, most commonly in domestic situations between spouses, family members, friends, coworkers, neighbors, and lovers. As for abortion, the human body has been aborting fetuses for millions of years, just like all mammals, as a defensive measure to protect the mother. Defensive security. Naturally occurring defensive actions. Why is a woman’s body allowed to miscarry or abort, but the woman herself is not allowed to make that choice? What makes the woman’s reasons (using her own thinking processes) any less natural or acceptable than her own body’s physiological/chemical/biological reasons? Seriously, ask yourself that question. Who should have ultimate control over a woman’s body? Herself (whether through biological processes beyond her control, such as spontaneous abortion or stillborn, or through thought processes where she decides to terminate the pregnancy of her own volition) or the state? Her body can choose to end the pregnancy at 38 weeks or she can choose to end it at 10 weeks, or sooner, or later, and it’s not the state’s business. End of story.

Now, back to the guns. Just seven hours ago, Creepy Joe said it’s time to ban assault weapons like he did when he “took on the NRA” back in 1994.

antisocial media

I don’t know why I’m writing this post, but a part of me feels it is necessary to say something even though I know I am wasting my time, not just because only one or two people will actually read this, but because who gives a fuck about what happens in Hollywood? Seriously, why are so many people so consumed with and fixated on what happens with celebrities and entertainers? It’s as though they are as important, or more important than themselves, as well as their families, friends, and loved ones. I don’t watch the oscars, I mean, I’ve never been a movie buff or someone who is deeply interested in movies. If I see five movies each year, that is a lot. However, when I was a kid in the 1980s I watched a ton of movies since my mother worked at a video store and was constantly bringing home new releases, but that was a long time ago, and now I hardly watch any movies. If there’s a book I would rather read the book, but I digress, I know, this has nothing to do with what I’m about to post, but I feel some background info is necessary, especially when I am about to post on a subject I never write or tweet about. What I am about to say is from a truly observational perspective as someone who has little to no interest in Hollywood and the movie industry.

The Chris Rock and Will Smith PSYOP. If anything, it was good for future ratings. For the following two days it was the number one trend on twitter. Everyone weighed in and shared their opinions. The official story was Chris Rock delivered a joke about Jada Pinkett Smith’s alopecia and Will Smith reacted by walking up on stage and slapping Rock before returning to his seat, at which point Rock replied: “Will Smith just smacked the shit out of me!” Smith then yelled at Rock: “Keep my wife’s name out your fucking mouth!” And when I first watched it, a couple hours after it happened, and people made slow motion clips and the audio was there for everyone to hear, I’m not going to lie, my initial gut reaction was I thought it was scripted from the moment I watched it unfold. I didn’t know anything about the incident, I didn’t read anything about what happened, in fact, the first thing I did was watch a “Japanese tv video” of the event, and from the moment I saw Will Smith stand up and head toward the stage, I was like, What are they doing, a skit? That’s what I was thinking to myself. I thought the whole skit was a joke, the slap, the “keep my wife’s name” shit, everything, I thought from the moment I saw it: This shit is fake. Not fake in the sense of “it didn’t happen,” but rather, fake in the sense of, this is a script written by the writers and producers of the useless awards show that has exuded patriarchy and racism for nearly a century. Fuck the oscars, they don’t even deserve a capital O.

But the Rock-Smith PSYOP, of course that’s what I’m going to call it (such-and-such PSYOP, that’s my signature classification for the majority of shit that is or isn’t circulating in the so-called news) and the Rock-Smith PSYOP is yet another example of racism in mainstream entertainment, let’s be real, black entertainers are ultimately subservient to the Hollywood executives who are mostly white. It’s another example of portraying black people as insensitive (Rock) and violent (Smith). Black people fighting. Black men acting chivalrous. Viewership of the academy awards has been on the decline for more than a decade and the Rock-Smith PSYOP conveniently rejuvenated their brand. It doesn’t matter whether you believe it was real or fake (scripted) because that is irrelevant. A super famous world renowned black actor was portrayed as violent, and he was subsequently banned from attending the academy awards for the next ten years. Smith ultimately apologized and said the academy’s decision was justified. How cute and convenient. What a fucking joke. Personally, I believe the entire shit was scripted, in the sense of this: Rock was told to make a joke about Jada’s hair and Smith was told to defend his wife by walking up on stage and slapping Rock. Yes, I believe he was instructed to slap him, not punch him. A man who defends his wife typically punches the offender. But not Smith. He’s like, I’m gonna slap that bitch. I couldn’t make this shit up if I tried. Do you really think that Smith gives a fuck that he can’t attend the oscars for the next ten years? Rumor has it he doesn’t even like going to the oscars, and that’s why he’s a no-show sometimes. He can still win awards, for what it’s worth, he got to keep the award he won on the night of the slap, and he should win another award for best performance during an oscars skit.

Black people are a political football. And political doesn’t necessarily refer to politics of government, it can refer to politics in general. The politics of society, culture, identity, race, etc. Divide and conquer. Black men are insensitive and violent. Always cracking jokes and fighting. Protecting their mute women who cheat on them with their son’s friend, but they have an open marriage, that’s the story, or so it goes. But for some reason, I can’t stop thinking about how black people here in America are a political football. Nothing more, nothing less. Politics are deep inside everything. Politics are ubiquitous. Divide and conquer. And, because of the Rock-Smith PSYOP, I also learned that white people are not allowed to comment or opine on the Rock-Smith PSYOP, and that it’s a “black folks issue” or “only concerns black folks.” I mean, that’s what I read on the antisocial media, so it must be true. But, for some reason I keep going back to the political football and the words of the great late and timeless Malcolm X:

“Politically the American Negro is nothing but a football and the white liberals control this mentally dead ball through tricks of tokenism: false promises of integration and civil rights. In this profitable game of deceiving and exploiting the political politician of the American Negro, those white liberals have the willing cooperation of the Negro civil rights leaders. These "leaders" sell out our people for just a few crumbs of token recognition and token gains. These "leaders" are satisfied with token victories and token progress because they themselves are nothing but token leaders.”

That quote is only one piece of a much larger speech Malcolm X delivered in 1963. At the time, Malcolm was still a member of the Nation of Islam, and still referring to his leader as the Honorable Elijah Muhammad. It should be noted that some of what Malcolm said throughout the speech did not reflect the views he espoused after he denounced Elijah, left the NOI, and followed “true Islam” (not my words lol). However, his observations in 1963 were spot on, and still true in the present as black Americans are still sadly nothing more than a “mentally dead ball” controlled by white liberals “through tricks of tokenism.”

I know I’m late to the game and I should’ve posted this weeks ago, if not months ago, but my reason for not doing so would require its own post or explanation. Bottom line (I hate that I use that phrase) is this: The Rock-Smith drama saga is just another divide and conquer psychological operation, whether orchestrated by Hollywood writers and producers or wholly organic, it is nothing more than a means to put black violence under a microscope for everyone to judge and critique simply because American culture is a subjective and self-centered narcissistic devolutionary juggernaut of racist, elitist, supremacist, corporatist, and misogynist mores and systems. Ostensibly, black Americans and their centuries-long struggle for civil rights and putting an end to systemic racism can only be viewed through the lens of violence: gang violence, police violence, domestic violence, professional sports violence, or in the case of the Rock-Smith PSYOP, entertainment violence.

document the event?

They needed a video of the first plane because what if Naudet didn’t capture the first plane AA11, then they would’ve made the 9/11 documentary around the Urban Moving Systems video, the one the FBI couldn’t locate when they arrested the five israelis in New Jersey on 9/11 after eyewitnesses saw them in the parking lot behind the Doric apartments (as well as in Liberty State Park in NJ) with what they explicitly described as a handheld video camera featuring a pop-out LCD screen, the same one I believe they used for panning the skyline and recording AA11 as it streamed down the Hudson and plowed into the Notth Tower at a crazy fast speed, thus beginning the new Pearl Harbor, but one that was far more deadly and costly in terms of endless wars and death and destruction and psychological warfare on levels unprecedented and most likely to never be repeated, at least in my lifetime, although I do have an argument about how covid is the new Pearl Harbor, the new 9/11, the biological 9/11, the psychological 9/11, the deadliest 9/11 thus far, but I’ll save that for another day.

“Document the event.” That is what one of the UMS israelis said when interviewed on israeli television. What did he mean? Was he being literal? Was his purpose to “document the event”? I believe he was proud of his documentation, but angry that he couldn’t show it to the world because of the Naudet tape. I believe there were multiple groups of israelis, throughout the United States, especially in Florida, New York, New Jersey, and some other key locations. I believe some of them were fronting as moving companies, even the FBI said it was unusual that inside the van containing the israelis arrested on 9/11, there were no indicators that it was used as a moving truck. No blankets, gloves, boxes, packaging materials, ropes, etc. you wouldn’t have known they were a moving company by looking inside their truck. More than a dozen computers were found networked inside their office. What size moving company do you think would need more than a dozen computers to running their business? Even the FBI commented that it was an unusually large number of computers for a business its size. Why did Suter, the owner of UMS, suddenly fly back to israel once fights resumed? Why did he leave his business behind? The same business for which he received a 600K government business loan during summer, 2001. Why did the israeils have plane tickets for Tel Aviv via Greece dated 9/12? Why were they ready to leave the US the day after 9/11? Why did they lie about their whereabouts when the first plane hit the north tower at 846a? Why did they fail multiple polygraphs? Why were they deported back to israel 71 days after they were detained? Chertoff? Mueller? Barr? Anyone?

Recently, a new 9/11 video has surfaced. In my opinion, it is the best video of UA175 approaching the South Tower. It is excellent quality. There are other videos which are equally phenomenal, but this new video is fresh, and the angle is unique. The video camera was in the right place at the right time. Here’s the alleged story: 

Kevin Westley shot his video on 9/11 from a ferry off the southern end of Manhattan where the Hudson and East Rivers converge in Upper New York Bay, south of the Battery, on the top deck of a ferry (Staten Island ferry?) with dozens of other onlookers, and Kevin has the video camera, thankfully he didn’t leave it home or in the hotel room. What was he doing there on 9/11? Was he on vacation? With family? Work trip? Did he live in Brooklyn or New Jersey? What took him 20 years to publicize the video? Read what he says in the description of the video on youtube. He claims he “posted the video in the 2000s but accidentally made it private, and I just realized it was private so I made it public.” He didn’t say whether he posted it privately on youtube or on another site. If he posted it on youtube, the earliest he could have posted it was 2005. This begs the question, Did youtube have a private feature in 2005? I know, I’m splitting hairs here, but I suffer from curiosity syndrome and I would like to know if he posted it privately on youtube, and which year did youtube first allow private videos to be posted? They are honest questions, we’re still allowed to ask questions, right?

I started to go down the Kevin Westley rabbit hole, but I decided to resurface before I crossed the point of no return. I saw he worked for Boeing, served in Iraq after 9/11, etc., but I want to focus on the video. The video is what matters. Maybe Weatley was told to have his video camera ready on the morning of 9/11, in perfect view of the South Tower and the approach of UA175, you know, right place at the right time, like the Naudet brothers, filmmakers who were making a documentary about a rookie firefighter, and Naudet happened to be filming the fire department’s response to a gas leak with a perfect vantage point of the North Tower, and the approach of AA11. Right place at the right time. And now, more than 20 years after 9/11, we finally have a video to compliment the Naudet video. A sister video. In my opinion, they are the best (not the best word lol) videos to emerge from 9/11. Here is the Naudet video.

But, these are two videos that were seemingly produced for mass consumption, to produce a desired effect, trauma. The Naudet video was featured in their documentary 9/11, released on 9/11/02. Of course, these videos are overshadowed by the video we haven’t seen. The video we know exists because eyewitnesses were certain they observed a handheld camera with LCD pop-out screen used for making videos. Surprise, the israelis denied they were taking video on the morning of 9/11, and the FBI claimed they didn’t discover any videos, only 35mm rolls of film which they developed, the rolls of film which featured one of the israelis holding up a cigarette lighter to one of the burning towers as though he was setting it on fire. Yes, without the israeli video from the man who said he was there to document the event, without that video we have an incomplete collection. The israeli video likely captures AA11 as it is flying down the Hudson, 10-20 seconds before it strikes the North Tower, with a perfect vantage point from the parking lot of the Doric Apartments. Obviously, the perfect vantage point would have been somewhere on the island of Manhattan, but then they may have been trapped on the island once the bridges and tunnels were closed down, so they trusted Naudet would get the right shot, and he certainly did, but I want to see the israeli video. By all likelihood they reached the Doric by 8:32am, nearly 15 minutes before AA11 hit the North Tower, in other words, plenty of time for the israelis to position themselves on top of their truck, in preparation for the event. To document the event.

the globalists

I’ll start by saying this: There is more than meets the eye regarding the Sandy Hook Elementary School event. I haven’t been down the SHES rabbit hole in several years, but when I walked away from it in 2013-14, I was a firm believer that the event was staged and that no children were murdered by the alleged perpetrator Adam Lanza. At that time I believed that 27 students and staff weren’t killed on December 14, 2012. But I had to eventually walk away because I was deep down the rabbit hole and I had not seen light for weeks, if not months. It was dark and depressing. It was psychological warfare to the utmost degree. It was sickening. So, I walked away and didn’t look back for a long time. Then the Boston bombing PSYOP happened.

Sometime in 2017, I was reading Michael Collins Piper’s book False Flags: Templates for Terror, where he had written a chapter about Sandy Hook. And in the chapter he expressed his position that Snady Hook was a real event where children were killed, and it was part of an anti-gun agenda maybe, and goes on to say that people pushing the Sandy Hook hoax narrative are purposefully muddying the waters in “conspiracy theory” circles.

*cues Cass Sunstein*

So, I began to think about Alex Jones, the InfoWars entertainer/exaggerator, and his claim that no one died at Sandy Hook, and how his claims landed him in legal trouble, the lawsuits contending that “he showed a reckless disregard for the truth which caused distress to the parents of the Sandy Hook victims.” Not to mention the fact that Jones was making the claims, while profiting in the process, money from the sales of the merch and elixirs on his website as well as the advertisers on his syndicated radio program. It’s possibly part of a deal he brokered with his handlers. It’s possible Jones is an asset and he intentionally muddied the waters with very limited rules (golden rule: hands off israel) and he obscenely profited from his website and radio broadcast, and it’s possible that when he was no longer useful as an asset (specifically after his alleged role in orchestrating the Capitol Riot PSYOP) and power shifted to the other divide and conquer war party, he was no longer useful and thus thrown to the legal wolves, to set an example, and to further discredit “conspiracy theorists,” not just regarding Sandy Hook, but also 9/11, especially 9/11, even if by default, but not default alone.

Alex Jones is the tin foil hat poster child. Sorry, it’s true. He was never anything more than an entertainer. Whether it is by intel design or his own design, he serves the same purpose no matter which circumstances landed him in his situation or position (let’s not forget about his ex-wife, Kelly Nichols). It was evident even during Y2K, remember during that particular radio broadcast he was proclaiming, “The Russians are coming!” and shit about the power grid and ATM machines and martial law. He was full of shit, possibly a controlled opposition asset by the turn of the century, or even around the time of 9/11. Let’s not forget that he sometimes boasted about his familial intelligence connections. In some ways Jones was “successful” but now he’s trying to squeeze his way out of a trial, offering each of the victims families $120K to settle outside of the courtroom, but they refused his offer. Do the families have a number? What if he offers them each $1 million? Would that be enough? Do they have a crazy price?

In court documents, Jones says he suffered mental illness (or something similar) and that is why he believed and proclaimed that no children died at Sandy Hook, it’s all fake, even the families are fake. And, now here we are, 25 years after Alex Jones claimed in a 1997 police report that a group of counterculture gen-x types assaulted him at the radio station and were going to kill him, at least he was punched in the face multiple times by the gen-x types, as well as by his producer Charlie Sotelo, because he just didn’t know when to shut the fuck up.

I haven’t concluded whether or not Jones is/was an asset. I believe if he is an asset, still being used, in this case, it is to backtrack and apologize about his proclamations regarding Sandy Hook even though the families allegedly don’t give a fuck, that’s not his purpose and effect (remember muddying the waters and discrediting “conspiracy theorists”). If Jones was groomed as an asset as early as high school, don't forget his family moved from Dallas to Austin after Jones got in trouble for fighting. Personally, it doesn’t matter to me whether Jones was or wasn’t an intel asset, either way he’s still muddying the waters, backtracking on Sandy Hook, blaming mental illness, making up shit, exaggerating the facts. etc. Either way, the effect is the same, he is now a meme for “crazed conspiracy theorist” and he ultimately connects conspiracy theorists to the right-wing, republican, libertarian, conservative, whatever the fuck you want to call it, but that’s the Alex Jones effect, and it’s just one of his effects. It’s a typical divide and conquer paradigm, remember, the powerful want the proletariat fighting amongst each other rather than joining together and destroying the powerful by whatever means necessary.

Think about it. The modern poster child for tin foil hat (their phrase, not mine lol)  is Alex Jones, I mean he has been one of the most mainstream conspiracy theorists since 9/11, and remember it was Nichols who really made Jones into an icon, she managed the website, she got his wheels rolling up to full speed, she essentially created his persona and he owes her the world, but right now he’s trying to buy his way out of litigation. Either way, he’s going to be the example. It doesn’t matter if he is or isn’t an asset, the outcome is still the same: Jones is now the poster child for any “crazed conspiracy theorist” who believes 9/11 was an inside job. He’s being likened to Trump, QAnon, and the fake moon landing (all the way back to the late 1990s he was proclaiming NASA faked the moon landing). And now, if you question any official narrative, you are an “Alex Jones type” and/or a “tin foil hatter.” That is the outcome. One of the effects. That is the Alex Jones effect. According to the court documents, he knows that children died at Sandy Hook, and he blamed his mental state on “the trauma of the media and corporations lying so much.” He also claimed that a “form of psychosis” made him believe that Sandy Hook was a staged event. That’s the PSYOP. A form of psychosis. From here forward, if you question events such as Sandy Hook, 9/11, and of course covid, then you are suffering from psychosis.

*Cass Sunstein wins*

Like I said, I’m not sure if Alex Jones is a controlled op. I can go either way on the issue because it doesn’t change the effect of Alex Jones. It doesn’t matter if it’s his ex-wife, intel handlers, Jesuits, gay frogs, or even Alex Jones himself, his Fed status really doesn’t matter. What matters are the effects of Alex Jones, and that is a win for “the globalists” (one of AJ’s most repeated phrases) listen, and you can hear him saying it:

          the globalists the globalists

          the globalists the globalists the globalists

          the globalists

          gay frogs gay frogs gay frogs

          the globalists the globalists

          the globalists the globalists the globalists

          the globalists

They win because Jones is absolutely nothing more than a meme on steroids. Just remember, from here forward, if you question the official stories of major events like 9/11 or Sandy Hook or even covid, then you are an Alex Jones crazed right-wing republican tin foil hatter living in mom’s basement conspiracy theorist. Whatever that means.

*Sunstein introduces Joe Rogan*

Wait, didn’t Jones say shit about Rogan awhile back or was that just made-up internet bullshit? Shit for clicks. Fuck them both.

Photo by Shannon Hicks of the Newtown Bee

lost our senses

How do you know you all caught covid? That’s an excellent question. You’re right, I can’t say with absolute certainty that I know we all caught covid, but I can say with certainty that I know we all caught something, and I don’t believe it was a cold or the flu, and that something was unlike any other something we have experienced. Perhaps I shouldn’t call it covid, and I should call it something.  Our eldest daughter, who is 12, besides having strep throat twice in her life, rarely gets a cold, and if she does, it’s usually mild. Several weeks ago, just before bed on a Thursday night, she noticed she was warm, so we checked her temp, and it was 101+. Since the only two times she ever had a significant temp was when she had strep throat, we didn’t know if it may have been strep, flu, or something. Although I considered it, I honestly didn’t think it was something; I didn’t know what was causing the fever, but I hoped it would run its course by morning. At that time, she displayed no symptoms other than the fever. The following morning, she had a slight fever of 99.9, but she felt fine otherwise. Regardless, we brought her to our family doctor, and her lungs were clear and her blood pressure was normal. She was tested for strep, influenza, and something, and according to a rapid antigen (as well as a PCR test) she was positive for something called covid. Her fever never returned, and she displayed no further symptoms other than the loss of taste/smell for the following 48 hours. On Saturday morning, our other daughter who is 11, had a slight fever of 99.9, so we assumed she caught something as well. We did not take her to our doctor. She did not get tested. She contracted influenza twice in her life, and both bouts of flu knocked her out for more than 7 days, including several days of high fevers, loss of appetite, aches, fatigue, bedridden, etc. Her most recent bout of flu was in December 2019, when she had a fever that lasted 7+ days. At that time she tested positive for influenza A (I believe it was A, but I could be mistaken, it may have been B). Other than the flu, she has only experienced conjunctivitis (once) and mild colds, similar to her older sister. When she caught something, besides a slight fever for one day, she displayed no symptoms other than the loss of taste/smell, which lasted for approximately 48 hours, similar to her sister. Then, on Monday morning, I didn’t feel well, but I didn’t have a fever, however I was very achey and fatigued. That night, I woke up every hour with chills, but still no fever. For the next 3-5 days, I was very fatigued and not sleeping well; the chills would occur throughout the night and I was waking up every hour or so. By the fifth day, I started feeling 50% better, but then I lost my sense of taste/smell, and that lasted for more than 10 days. On Wednesday, two days after I started displaying symptoms, my partner Tree started showing symptoms. She had no fever, but she had tremendous pressure in her forehead, as well as intense sinus pressure. She was stuffy, her ears wouldn’t “pop,” and she was fatigued and achey; bedridden for two of those days. After approximately 7 days, she started to feel 50% better, but then she lost her sense of taste/smell, and experienced what she dubbed “brain fog” for nearly two weeks. My eldest daughter was the only person who was tested for something (therefore, three unreported cases from one home; think CFR). We all contracted something, and our symptoms varied with one exception: Our two daughters displayed similar mild symptoms (24-hour fever and 48-hour loss of taste/smell); Tree’s symptoms were noticeably worse than mine. Note: Tree received two shots of Pfizer back in March-April of this year; she is the only person in our house who was vaccinated; she has alopecia areata, an autoimmune disorder. The one common denominator was that all four of us lost our sense of taste/smell, which was highly unusual, and something we have never experienced. Also noteworthy, not one of us experienced shortness of breath, trouble breathing, or coughing (Tree had a very minor cough for two days) which were always claimed to be common symptoms. Tree rarely gets sick, except for the occasional cold (sometimes mild, sometimes moderate) and she contracted flu once when she was a child. She doesn’t get annual flu jabs. I rarely get sick, except for the occasional mild cold (exception: In 2018, I was working in an old damp dirt crawlspace for a few days without proper ventilation and protective equipment, and contracted a respiratory illness which knocked me out, bedridden for 3+ days). Other than that, I’ve never had flu, and I’ve never had a flu jab. Whatever the four of us contracted, it was unlike anything we’ve ever experienced in our lives. It was also the first time all four of us got infected with something at the same time. Note: I was in very close contact with our daughter both times she got the flu, and neither time did I get the flu. This was the first time all of us experienced the loss of taste/smell, evidence that something affected our neurological systems. Personally, I have never been achey and fatigued for more than 3 days without having a fever for more than 24 hours (recall the crawl space illness) and more importantly, I was achey and fatigued (although not bedridden like Tree) on and off for nearly two weeks because of something. The fact that Tree and I never had fevers at anytime was puzzling as well, especially since our daughters both had fevers for 24 hours (I attribute this to the strength and response of their immune systems). Whatever we contracted, whether it was covid, or something that is being labeled covid, was unlike anything we’ve ever experienced. And, the takeaway from all of this is that Tree is the only person in our house who was recently double jabbed for something, and yet she displayed the worst symptoms of all four of us, possibly due to the combination of her autoimmune disorder and the ineffectiveness of the vaxxx. Needless to say, neither Tree nor I want our daughters to be required to get the jab, and they have expressed to us that they don’t see a need for them to get the jab, not because of a fear of needles, rather because they contracted something labeled covid, recovered quickly, and probably now have the requisite antibodies (short-term at least). None of us have ever had the flu jab, and the public schools in our state (with the exception of pre-K in NYC) do not require flu jabs, but I have a suspicion that they will eventually try to require covid and/or flu jabs for public school students and staff here where I live; that is a reality the four of us, especially our daughters, may soon have to face. I hope this sheds some light on my experience, I am interested to hear your thoughts and insights.

Update: I originally wrote this post in November-December 2021 as a response to a reply I received from a twitter account I’ve been following for many years. I was going to reply on twitter in the form of a thread but I felt it would be too exhaustive so I decided to write the above post. The user’s question (reply) to my original tweet regarding my family’s suspected bout with covid was simple: “How do you know you all caught covid?” As I stated in the beginning of the post, the user is absolutely correct: I don’t know if what I had was in fact “covid,” or something called “covid,” but the experience led me to believe that what we caught was something novel that the four of us never once experienced prior to 2021, most notably the loss of taste and smell. All four of us lost our senses, Tree and I lost our senses for more than 10 days, if not longer. What we caught before Halloween 2021 was definitely something different than anything we ever experienced in the past. According to my eldest daughter’s PCR and RAT, she was positive for “covid,” and the fever that didn’t subside after 24 hours was what prompted us to test her for “covid.” Whatever we contracted (likely from my daughter who likely caught it from a friend or classmate) was novel and marked with specific characteristics which created a combination unlike anything I’ve ever contracted in my 45 years. For context regarding my immune system and sickness: I have never contracted influenza pneumonia hepatitis bronchitis staph etc, maybe I caught strep once or twice when I was a young kid, as well as the chicken pox, and the worst bout of sickness I ever endured was for several days after working in a post-wwii basement, damp, and dirty, moldy and crawling with all sorts of shit, and I wasn’t wearing a respirator or even a mask and I had K95s in my truck, but it was cold, late winter, and I felt fine until the 3rd day on the job and then I went downhill real fast, bottom line, I inhaled some nasty bacteria beneath that postwar cape and it wiped me out for 2-3 days straight fully bedridden and literally feeling like hell, sleeping and aching for my survival, trying to push back against the bacterial infection in my respiratory system. I eventually returned to the job 5 or 6 days later with a respirator and finished the job by taking 3-minute outdoor fresh air breaks every 17 minutes. Some of those postwar houses with their ancient dirt crawl spaces are without a doubt deadly and let’s not even talk about all of the creepy crawlers in those dark damp dirt dungeons crawling on my back when the lights are off, fuck me. Oh, and as of March 03, 2022 New York State has not required public school students to receive covid and flu jabs (Note: NYC requires pre-K and K children under 5 years to be flu jabbed as well as the pre-K and K teachers, instructors, caregivers, etc). Tree has been a public high school teacher for 22 years and she doesn’t think the state is going to force students to get the jabs, although she, as a teacher, is required to be jabbed (not for influenza though lol); she recently got boostered (she told me I could tell you that lol) so it goes…

Note: I am not going to post the tweet (How do you know you all caught covid?) that initiated this blog post out of respect for the tweet author who I have been mutually following since 2014-15. Instead, I am going to post a gif relevant to my next blog post, “the globalists.”